Comparison of keratoplasty outcomes at the scar versus edema stages of keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty or penetrating keratoplasty at the scar and the edema stages. METHODS: Forty-five patients (45 eyes) with keratoconus scar stage (scar group, n=26; penetrating keratoplasty a subgroup, n=7; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty b subgroup, n=19) and keratoconus edema stage (edema group, n=19; penetrating keratoplasty c subgroup, n=12; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty d group, n=7) who received penetrating keratoplasty or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty from 2000 to 2022 were retrospectively studied. At 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery, the best-corrected visual acuity, astigmatism, spherical equivalent, corneal endothelial cell density, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The best-corrected visual acuity and average corneal endothelial cell loss rate were not significantly different between the scar and edema groups (p>0.05). At 6 and 12 months after surgery, the astigmatism and spherical equivalent in the scar group were significantly lower than those in the edema group (p<0.05). The spherical equivalent of the deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty b subgroup was lower than that of the penetrating keratoplasty a subgroup in the scar group 6 months after surgery (p<0.05). In the edema group, there was no significant difference in spherical equivalent between subgroups (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity and astigmatism between subgroups within the two groups (p>0.05). In comparison to the scar group, the edema group experienced more complications. According to a survival analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between the scar group and the edema group regarding the progression of vision. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of the outcomes and prognosis for vision after keratoplasty with edema stage and scar stage, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty may be as effective as penetrating keratoplasty.

Emerging treatments for corneal endothelium decompensation - a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) is the conventional treatment to improve visual acuity of corneal endothelium decompensation (CED) patients, with other therapies mainly for symptomatic relief. However, the shortage of corneal grafts and other limitations to EK urge the development of novel alternative treatments. In the last decade, novel options have been proposed, yet only a limited number of reviews have systematically reported on outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review evaluates the existing clinical evidence of novel surgical approaches for CED. METHOD: We identified 24 studies that illustrated the clinical observations of the surgical approaches in interest. We included Descemet stripping only (DSO), Descemet membrane transplantation (DMT) where Descement membrane alone instead of corneal endothelium with cells is transplanted, and cell-based therapy. RESULTS: In general, these therapies may provide visual outcomes comparable with EK under specific conditions. DSO and DMT target CED with relatively healthy peripheral corneal endothelium like Fuchs' corneal endothelial dystrophy, while cell-based therapy offers more versatile applications. Side effects of DSO would decrease with modifications to surgical techniques. Moreover, Rho-associated protein kinase inhibitor adjuvant therapy could enhance clinical results in DSO and cell-based therapy. CONCLUSION: Long-term controlled clinical trials with larger sample size on the therapies are needed. The simplicity of DSO and the high translational potential of cell-based therapy to treat CED of most etiologies made these two treatment strategies promising.

Association Between Indication for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Rural Residency.

PURPOSE: Residing in rural locations can be a barrier to health care access. This study investigated the impact of residing in rural and small town (RST) areas on Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) indications and outcomes in Atlantic Canada. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis examined consecutive DSAEKs performed in Nova Scotia between 2017 and 2020. Patient rurality was determined by the Statistical Area Classification system developed by Statistics Canada. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess for factors associated with DSAEK indication, including repeat keratoplasty, RST residence status, and travel time. RESULTS: Of 271 DSAEKs during the study period, 87 (32.1%) were performed on the eyes of RST residents. The median postoperative follow-up time was 1.6 years. Undergoing DSAEK for a previous failed keratoplasty was not associated with a higher odds of RST residency (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-1.16; P = 0.13) but was associated with travel time (OR, 0.78 for each increasing hour of travel; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99; P = 0.044). RST residency was not associated with the occurrence of graft failure (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.17-1.17; P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Residing in a rural area in Atlantic Canada was not associated with DSAEK graft failure. Repeat endothelial keratoplasty was associated with shorter travel time for corneal surgery but not rural residency status. Further research in this field could inform regional health strategies aimed at improving equity and accessibility to ophthalmology subspecialist care.

Suture Fixation to Reduce Graft Detachment in Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of graft fixation using interrupted, full-thickness sutures on graft detachment after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). METHODS: All DSEK procedures performed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from 2015 through 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Risk factors for graft detachment were defined as previous incisional glaucoma surgery, previous penetrating keratoplasty, or absence of the normal lens-capsule barrier. Cases were categorized into sutured, high-risk grafts; unsutured, high-risk grafts; and unsutured, low-risk grafts. The primary outcome was graft detachment, and secondary outcomes were early graft failure and graft clarity at 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Demographics between the high-risk groups were similar for sex and age at the time of surgery. Graft detachment occurred in 4 of 97 sutured, high-risk eyes (4.1%) and 24 of 119 unsutured high-risk eyes (20.2%) ( P = 0.002). In comparison, graft detachment occurred in 18 of 181 unsutured low-risk eyes (9.9%). The incidence of early graft failure was 2.1%, 5.0%, and 3.3% and late graft failure by 12 months was 9.8%, 12.8%, and 4.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with high-risk factors for graft detachment, suture fixation of the graft in DSEK decreased graft detachment to a rate at least as low as that in low-risk eyes.

Five-year clinical outcomes of 107 consecutive DMEK surgeries.

PURPOSE: The long-term clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and graft survival of Descemet-membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) remain poorly understood. We retrospectively assessed these variables in all consecutive eyes that underwent DMEK for any indication in 2014-2018. The findings were compared to the long-term DMEK studies of five other groups (3-10-year follow-up). METHODS: Patients underwent ophthalmological tests preoperatively, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 postoperative months, and then annually. Five-year graft survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier estimator. Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial-cell density (ECD), and central-corneal thickness (CCT) at each timepoint was determined. RESULTS: 107 eyes (80 patients; 72 years old; 67% female) underwent first-time DMEK for uncomplicated Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (94% of eyes), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (3%), and regraft after previous keratoplasty (3%). The most common complication was graft detachment requiring rebubbling (18%). Thirteen grafts (12%) failed at ≤15 months. Cumulative 5-year graft-survival probability was 88% (95% confidence intervals = 79-94%). BCVA improved from 0.6 logMAR preoperatively to 0.05 logMAR at 1 year (p<0.0001) and then remained stable. Donor ECD dropped by 47% at 6 postoperative months and then continued to decrease by 4.0%/year. Five-year endothelial-cell loss was 65% (from 2550 to 900 cells/mm2). CCT dropped from 618 to 551 µm at 5 years (p<0.0001). These findings are generally consistent with previous long-term DMEK studies. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK has low complication and high graft-survival rates and excellent clinical outcomes that persist up to 5 years post-surgery. DMEK seems to be a safe and effective treatment in the long term.

Development of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Films for the Replacement of Corneal Endothelial Function of Transparency Maintenance.

Endothelial keratoplasty is the main surgical procedure for treating corneal endothelial dysfunction (CED), which is limited by the global shortage of donor corneas. Herein, we developed and evaluated the modified thermoplastic polyurethane (M-TPU) films with gelatin-glycidyl methacrylate to replace the corneal endothelial function and maintain corneal transparency. The films displayed comparable light transmission characteristics with normal corneas and clinically favorable mechanical properties for surgical manipulation. After surface modification, the hydrophilicity and biocompatibility of M-TPU films were significantly improved. In the rabbit CED model, the M-TPU implants exhibited firm adhesion to the exposed stromal surface. The rabbit corneal transparency and thickness could be restored completely within 1 week of M-TPU film implantation. There was no significant inflammatory reaction and immune rejection during the follow-up of 1 month. Proteomic analysis suggested that the complement inhibition, the increase of mineral absorption, and the decrease of P53 apoptosis signaling pathway and lysine degradation might be beneficial in maintaining the corneal transparency. Overall, our study demonstrated the potential of M-TPU films as artificial implants for the replacement of corneal endothelial function to restore corneal thickness and transparency.

Preoperative surgeon evaluation of corneal endothelial status: the Viability Control of Human Endothelial Cells before Keratoplasty (V-CHECK) study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The success of keratoplasty strongly depends on the health status of the transplanted endothelial cells. Donor corneal tissues are routinely screened for endothelial damage before shipment; however, surgical teams have currently no means of assessing the overall viability of corneal endothelium immediately prior to transplantation. The aim of this study is to validate a preoperative method of evaluating the endothelial health of donor corneal tissues, to assess the proportion of tissues deemed suitable for transplantation by the surgeons and to prospectively record the clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients undergoing keratoplasty in relation to preoperatively defined endothelial viability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre cohort study, consecutive patients undergoing keratoplasty (perforating keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), ultra-thin DSAEK (UT-DSAEK) or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) will be enrolled and followed-up for 1 year. Before transplantation, the endothelial viability of the donor corneal tissue will be evaluated preoperatively through trypan blue staining and custom image analysis to estimate the overall percentage of trypan blue-positive areas (TBPAs), a proxy of endothelial damage. Functional and structural outcomes at the end of the follow-up will be correlated with preoperatively assessed TBPA values. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol will be reviewed by the ethical committees of participating centres, with the sponsor centre issuing the final definitive approval. The results will be disseminated on ClinicalTrials.gov, at national and international conferences, by partner patient groups and in open access, peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05847387.

Belgian Endothelial Surgical Transplant of the Cornea (BEST cornea) protocol: clinical and patient-reported outcomes of Ultra-Thin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) - a multicentric, randomised, parallel group pragmatic trial in corneal endothelial decompensation.

OBJECTIVES: Corneal blindness is the third most frequent cause of blindness globally. Damage to the corneal endothelium is a leading indication for corneal transplantation, which is typically performed by lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. There are two conventional surgical techniques: Ultra-Thin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). The purpose of this study is to compare both techniques. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The trial compares UT-DSAEK and DMEK in terms of clinical and patient reported outcomes using a pragmatic, parallel, multicentric, randomised controlled trial with 1:1 allocation with a sample size of 220 participants across 11 surgical centres. The primary outcome is the change in best-corrected visual acuity at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include corrected and uncorrected vision, refraction, proportion of high vision, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and VFQ25), endothelial cell counts and corneal thickness at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up appointments. Adverse events will also be compared 12 months postoperatively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was reviewed by ethical committees of 11 participating centres with the sponsor centre issuing the final definitive approval. The results will be disseminated at clinical conferences, by patient partner groups and open access in peer-reviewed journals. GOVERNANCE OF THE TRIAL: Both, trial management group and trial steering committee, are installed with representatives of all stakeholders involved including surgeons, corneal bankers, patients and external experts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05436665.

Comparison of penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty in patients with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: A registry study.

BACKGROUND: To compare graft survival of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) versus penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome and identify ocular features associated with graft survival. METHODS: Observational, prospective, cohort study. A total of 30 806 first grafts performed between 1985 and 2020 were identified through the Australian Corneal Graft Registry and included in this observational, prospective cohort study. A total of 196 eyes underwent a primary corneal graft for ICE syndrome. Kaplan-Meier graft survival plots and Chi-squared tests were performed to identify graft survival rates for EK and PK. A history of raised intraocular pressure (IOP) was also recorded and analysed. Graft survival of eyes with ICE syndrome were compared to that of other indications. RESULTS: Grafts performed for ICE syndrome increased to 0.8% of all cases during the 2005 to 2020 period compared with 0.5% between 1985 to 2004 (χ2 =9.35, p = 0.002). From 2010, EK surpassed PK as the preferred graft type. Survival of primary grafts in eyes with ICE syndrome was lower than for other indications (log-rank = 56.62, p < 0.001). Graft survival was higher following PK than Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DS(A)EK) (log-rank = 10.56, p = 0.001). Graft survival was higher in eyes without a history of raised IOP compared to those with a reported history of raised IOP (log-rank = 13.06, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ICE syndrome carries a poor prognosis for graft survival. DS(A)EK had a poorer prognosis than PK. A history of raised IOP is associated with higher risk of graft failure.

DMEK surgical training: An instructional guide on various wet-lab methods.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a partial-thickness corneal transplantation procedure that involves selective transplantation of the Descemet membrane and endothelium. DMEK offers significant advantages over other keratoplasty techniques, such as faster visual rehabilitation, better final visual acuity due to minimal optical interface effects, lower risk of allograft rejection, and less long-term dependence on topical steroids. Despite all its advantages, DMEK has been found to be more challenging than other corneal transplantation techniques, and its steep learning curve appears to be an obstacle to its widespread use and adoption by corneal surgeons worldwide. DMEK surgical training laboratories (wet labs) provide a window of opportunity for surgeons to learn, prepare, manipulate, and deliver these grafts in a risk-free environment. Wet labs are a significant learning tool, especially for those institutions that have limited tissue availability in their local centers. We provide a step-by-step guide for preparing DMEK grafts using different techniques on human and nonhuman models with instructional videos. This article should eventually help the trainees and the educators understand the requirements for performing DMEK and conducting a DMEK wet lab and develop their skills and interests from a wide variety of available techniques.

Comparison of repeat penetrating keratoplasty, DSAEK and DMEK for the management of endothelial failure of previous PK.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of repeat PK, DSAEK-on-PK or DMEK-on-PK for the management of endothelial failure of previous penetrating keratoplasty. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: 104 consecutive eyes of 100 patients requiring a second keratoplasty for endothelial failure of their primary penetrating keratoplasty performed between September 2016 and December 2020. INTERVENTION: Repeat keratoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival and visual acuity at 12 and 24 months, rebubbling rate and complications. RESULTS: Repeat PK was performed in 61/104 eyes (58.7%), DSAEK-on-PK was performed in 21/104 eyes (20.2%) and DMEK-on-PK was performed in 22/104 eyes (21.2%). Failure rates in the first 12 and 24 months were 6.6% and 20.6% for repeat PKs compared to 19% and 30.6% for DSAEK and 36.4% and 41.3% for DMEK. For those grafts surviving 12 months, the chances of surviving to 24 months were greatest for DMEK-on-PK at 92% vs 85% each for redo PK and DSAEK-on-PK. Visual acuity at one year was logMAR 0.53 ± 0.51 in the redo PK group, 0.25 ± 0.17 for DSAEK-on-PK and 0.30 ± 0.38 for DMEK-on-PK. 24-month outcomes were 0.34 ± 0.28, 0.08 ± 0.16, and 0.36 ± 0.36 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK-on-PK has a greater failure rate in the first 12 months than DSAEK-on-PK which has a greater failure rate than redo PK. However, the 2-year survival rates in our series for those already surviving 12 months were greatest for DMEK-on-PK. There was no significant difference in visual acuity at 12 or 24 months. Careful patient selection is needed by experienced surgeons to determine which procedure to offer to patients.

Role of descemet's stripping without keratoplasty in management of endothelial disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize recent literature on Descemet's stripping only (DSO) in management of endothelial disease with particular focus on Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). RECENT FINDINGS: DSO is currently indicated in patients with early FECD, central guttae, and preserved peripheral corneal endothelial cell (CEC) count. Time to corneal clearance may be accelerated and maintained with addition of topical rho-kinase inhibitor (ROCKi). There are reports describing successful use of DSO to treat endothelial disease due to iatrogenic trauma. In patients with transcription factor 4 gene mutation, increased cytosine, thymine, guanine (CTG) triplet repeat load may be associated with DSO failure risk. Emerging pharmacotherapies and cell-suspension treatments may improve procedure effectiveness and expand clinical indications. SUMMARY: DSO can be used as the initial surgical treatment in management of symptomatic endothelial disease due to FECD where peripheral CEC function appears preserved. Stand-alone DSO or DSO combined with cataract surgery is effective and postoperative topical ROCKi supplementation will improve time to corneal clearance and CEC count.

Aclaramiento corneal espontáneo tras desprendimiento del injerto en DMEK / Spontaneous corneal clearance after graft detachment in DMEK

El desprendimiento de la membrana de Descemet es una complicación potencial tras la queratoplastia endotelial de la membrana de Descemet (DMEK, acrónimo en inglés de Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty). En este artículo presentamos un caso clínico de una cirugía DMEK en un caso complicado, que presentó un desprendimiento casi completo del injerto y posteriormente una opacificación de este y la formación de una seudocámara anterior. En noviembre del 2020, se realizó una cirugía DMEK a un paciente de 64 años debido a una descompensación endotelial. Tres meses después del DMEK, se observó el injerto desprendido y parcialmente adherido, fibrótico en la cámara anterior y formando una seudocámara anterior. Sin embargo, la córnea se mantuvo totalmente transparente con un recuento endotelial de aproximadamente 1.204 células/mm2 y la agudeza visual con corrección fue 20/25. Tres meses más tarde, se objetivó una opacificación significativa del injerto despegado y la agudeza visual disminuyó a 20/63. Procedimos a la extracción del injerto sin realizar una segunda DMEK. Diez meses más tarde, la córnea permaneció transparente con un recuento endotelial de 510 células/mm2 y la agudeza visual con corrección fue 20/25 (AU)

Descemet Membrane detachment is a potential complication after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). Here, we present a unique case of a DMEK surgery in a complicated eye that suffered a nearly complete DMEK graft detachment and later a graft opacification with a pseudo-anterior chamber. In Mid-November 2020, a planned DMEK was performed in a 64-year-old male patient due to corneal decompensation. Four months after DMEK, a fibrotic DMEK graft was seen across the anterior chamber with a pseudo-anterior chamber; however, the recipient cornea showed complete clearance with an endothelial cell count of about 1204 cells/mm2 and a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/25. Three months later, we observed a significant opacification of the detached graft, and the best-corrected distance visual acuity decreased to 20/63. We proceeded with the graft removal without performing a second DMEK. Ten months after graft removal, the cornea remained clear with an endothelial cell count of about 510 cells/mm2, and the best-corrected visual acuity was 20/25 (AU)

Descemet Stripping Without Endothelial Keratoplasty in Early-Stage Central Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy: Long-term Results.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of Descemet stripping without endothelial keratoplasty (DWEK) associated with phacoemulsification in patients with early-stage central Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. METHODS: This is a retrospective study, including all patients submitted to DWEK associated with cataract surgery with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Included patients had central confluent guttae confirmed with specular microscopy, a clear peripheral endothelium (with a peripheral endothelial count >1500 cells/mm 2 ), and a central pachymetry <600 µm. The main end points were the presence of a clear cornea and time that was needed to achieve transparency, best-corrected visual acuity in logMAR, endothelial central cell count (ECC), and central pachymetry. RESULTS: A total of 22 eyes were included with a mean follow-up of 40.8 ± 10.5 months. At baseline, mean central pachymetry was 536 ± 34 mm and 6 eyes had countable ECC (mean 1138 ± 190 cells/mm 2 ). Twenty eyes (90.9%) achieved good corneal transparency 3.2 ± 1.1 months after surgery. There was a significant improvement in logMAR best-corrected visual acuity compared with baseline (0.13 ± 0.10 vs. 0.48 ± 0.24, respectively, P < 0.001). Endothelial central repopulation was observed in all successful cases. Twelve months after DWEK, ECC was 1449 ± 344 cells/mm 2 and 1393 ± 450 cells/mm 2 at the end of follow-up, without a significant decrease between this period ( P = 0.081). Only 2 eyes (9.1%) did not achieve corneal transparency and were submitted to an endothelial keratoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, DWEK is a safe and effective procedure in selected cases of early-stage central Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. This seems to be a promising technique, delaying or avoiding endothelial transplantation.

Long-Term Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Effect of Surgical Indication and Disease Severity.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and graft survival in a large patient cohort up to 10 years after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) based on surgical indication and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) severity. METHODS: The cohort in this retrospective study included 750 eyes that underwent DMEK for FECD (86%), bullous keratopathy (BK, 9%), and other indications (5%). Based on the modified Krachmer grading, 186 eyes (29%) had moderate FECD (Krachmer grade 3-4) and 440 eyes (68%) had advanced FECD (Krachmer grade 5-6). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density (ECD), endothelial cell loss (ECL), postoperative complication rate, and graft survival. RESULTS: The mean 10-year BCVA was 0.08 ± 0.28 logMAR (n = 96), and the BCVA remained stable between 5 and 10 years postoperatively (all P > 0.05). The mean ECL at 5 and 10 years was 56% ± 17% (n = 460) and 66% ± 14% (n = 96), respectively ( P < 0.05). The 10-year graft survival rate for the total cohort was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.89). BCVA and ECD differed at 1 to 5 years between eyes with different surgical indications (all P < 0.05), and FECD eyes had higher graft survival compared with BK eyes (0.90 vs. 0.60, P = 0.001). Moderate FECD eyes had better BCVA, ECD, and graft survival outcomes than advanced FECD eyes (all P < 0.05). Minor graft detachment ( P = 0.04) and lower donor ECD ( P = 0.01) were related to lower 10-year ECD. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes and graft survival after DMEK were better in FECD eyes than BK eyes and were also related to FECD disease severity. Eyes operated for moderate FECD showed the highest graft survival probability and excellent long-term outcomes.

Recurrence of Guttae and Endothelial Dysfunction After Successful Descemet Stripping Only in Fuchs Dystrophy.

PURPOSE: There are limited data about long-term durability of endothelial rejuvenation after Descemet stripping only (DSO). This study reports a case of bilaterally recurrent endothelial dysfunction and guttae formation after initially successful DSO in combination with cataract extraction (DSO-CE). METHODS: This is a retrospective case report. A 49-year-old man with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy with bilateral visually significant endothelial guttae (predominantly confluent centrally) and concomitant cataract underwent DSO-CE bilaterally. Postoperative course to long-term outcome at 6 years was analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline central corneal thickness (CCT) was 568 µm in OD and 582 µm in OS. Preoperatively, both eyes had no countable central endothelial cells but good peripheral endothelial mosaic. In both eyes, the cornea clinically cleared at approximately 1 month postoperatively after DSO-CE. In short-term follow-up (OD postoperative month 6 and OS postoperative month 3), CCT was 556 µm in OD and 561 µm in OS and central endothelial cell density was 1352 cells/mm 2 in OD and 880 cells/mm 2 in OS. The patient returned to our center in postoperative year 6 OU. At this time, OU had interval formation of guttae within the descemetorhexis, with increased CCT (OD 631 µm and OS 609 µm) and decreased central endothelial cell density (OD 728 cells/mm 2 and OS 609 cells/mm 2 ). CONCLUSIONS: After DSO, progressive endothelial dysfunction with new guttae formation can occur within the descemetorhexis region of repopulated endothelium. Larger analyses with longer follow-up are needed to better characterize long-term outcomes of DSO.

Interface Fluid Syndrome After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With History of LASIK.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the visual, pachymetric, tomographic, and biomicroscopic findings in a series of cases with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap interface fluid syndrome (IFS) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: Six cases were included in this study; all patients had a history of LASIK and underwent DMEK for the treatment of bullous keratopathy. After uneventful surgery, all patients presented with corneal edema and IFS under the LASIK flap, which was demonstrated with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Visual acuity, clinical findings, pachymetry, endothelial cell count, and AS-OCT were documented during the management of these cases. RESULTS: IFS appears 2.33 days (±1.03) after DMEK. One case improved with conservative treatment. In 5 cases, the LASIK flap was lifted, the fluid was drained, and the flap was replaced. The mean best-corrected visual acuity after fluid drainage was 0.44 logMAR (range 0.18-1.0) and mean central corneal thickness was 538 µm ± 160. Total resolution of the IFS was achieved at 14.5 days (range 4-30) after DMEK. AS-OCT showed resolution of the flap interface in 5 of 6 cases, while 1 patient required second DMEK due to reaccumulation of the interface fluid. CONCLUSIONS: IFS can occur after DMEK in patients with previous LASIK. AS-OCT is a valuable tool for monitoring these cases preoperatively and postoperatively. Early surgical management is often needed to achieve resolution.

Preparation of endothelial keratoplasty lamellae from donated whole eyes post vitreous humour aspiration at the central eye bank of Iran.

To compare the endothelial parameters and thickness profiles of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) lamellae from donated whole eyes post vitreous humour aspiration (VHA) with those prepared from their mate control eyes (without VHA). Between March 2019 and March 2020, a few steps were added when aspirating the vitreous humour and also before dissecting the corneal tissue with microkeratome. EK lamellae were prepared from whole eyes that underwent VHA and their corresponding endothelial and thickness profiles were compared with those prepared from their respective fellow control eyes. Post-operative data in terms of graft attachment and clarity and the rate of reoperation were also reviewed. 115 eyes that underwent VHA and 115 of their respective fellow eyes were enrolled. No significant difference was noted in the endothelial parameters between the two groups. Mean central thickness of the EK lamellae and increase of thickness towards the periphery were not significantly different between the groups. Both groups did not show a significant difference with respect to the anticipated dissection depth, post-operative graft clarity, graft attachment, and the rate of regraft. This study demonstrates that aspirating vitreous humour has no adverse effect on the endothelial and thickness profiles of the EK lamellae that are prepared from these donated whole eyes, once the specific steps outlined by the eye bank are adhered to when aspirating the vitreous humor before performing the microkeratome dissection. The success rate of the grafted lamellae was comparable between the study groups.